TRAVEL
HISTORY
PEOPLE/CULTURES
SCIENCE
ENVIRONMENT
COUNTRIES
|
|
|
|
| Arctic
Fishery Facts |
|
Greenland's fish
exports |
95% of tot. |
|
Amt. of Undersized
Arctic Catch |
Up to 77% |
|
Iceland's Fishing
Income |
70% of total |
|
Principal Arctic
Fish Species |
Salmon, cod, char,
halibut, capelin, herring |
|
Principal Fishing
Method |
Gillnetting |
|
Tot. # of Sea Birds
Entangled |
About
300,000 a year |
|
|
|
The Arctic is attractive for fishing
as a few productive species dominate, thereby reducing
wasted bycatch.
The low number of species means
that overfishing can have disastrous effects.
Selective fishing practices have
dramatically reduced populations of northern char
and salmon.
The herring industry declined
in the 1970s followed by capelin stocks which collapsed
twice since a peak catch of 3 million tons in 1977.
Salmon farming may cause genetic
loss in salmon as well as degeneration of local species
populations due to competition from alien species. |
|
Overfishing in the Arctic
The Arctic region contains some of the world's richest fishing
grounds. The Bering, Barents, and Greenland Seas provide important
sources of income (and nutrition) to peoples all along the Arctic
coastline. In fact, many indigenous people maintain sustainable
traditional lifestyles from the sea. Over the past 100 years, however,
commercial overexploitation and new techniques have rapidly increased
the levels of all marine catches. Many Arctic fisheries are at their
lowest levels ever, resulting in higher percentages of smaller and
immature fish being harvested. In addition, countless birds, seals,
and other marine mammals die each year from starvation as important
prey populations decline or from drowning due to fishing net entanglement.
Meanwhile, the financial captains of the global fishing industry
continue in their unsustainable, competitive rush to turn more fish
into short term profits.
The Arctic region is attractive for fishing as only a few productive
species dominate, thereby reducing wasted bycatch. However, the
selective removal of the most commercially viable (and often the
largest) fish can have disastrous effects on species lower in the
food chain, ultimately leading to ecosystem breakdown. This domino
effect of species depletion can have impacts even centuries later.
Overfishing of Arctic stocks disrupts the intricate web of marine
biodiversity that makes the oceans such a vital and productive part
of the Earth's life support system. Fisheries research and management
institutions everywhere have fallen far behind the rapid advances
in fishing technology. Instead of coming to grips with the need
for dramatic cuts, nations argue over who will get how much of what
remains of dwindling fish stocks.
Recently there have been examples of successful management resulting
in increasing yields. The regulation of Barents Sea fisheries have
had promising results. This is only possible through improved patterns
of cooperation between the coastal fishing states of the high North.
By working together, nations can move current conservation and restoration
practices away from quota systems and no-fishing zones to a more
broad-based ecosystem approach.
|